Just got this GEN sub from Ebay... love it.
Anyone thought ?https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...abb92346fa.jpg
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Printable View
Just got this GEN sub from Ebay... love it.
Anyone thought ?https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...abb92346fa.jpg
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Looks like a rep to me.
Really ?
I had it checked out
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Who checked it out?Quote:
Originally Posted by 116610watches
A jeweler who services Rolex watches.... he kept the watch overnight for inspection
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Which part looks off to you ?
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
The case looks like a rep.
I would say the same...looks off
I wholeheartedly agree. Looks like the bezel is gen along with gen crystal and date wheel.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiderdaus
OP - Can you provide a movement picture.
Looks like you may have been scammed on EBay.
- - - Updated - - -
Crown guards look like they been altered as they don't look gen to me.
Here is a pic I had taken a while ago to make sure its gen https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...308cd2362e.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by daytonadragon
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Excuse my ignorance, but which model number is that?
What do you think ? It looks fine to me. As it did to the jeweler a fews days backQuote:
Originally Posted by daytonadragon
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
This is a 16610 model no lug holesQuote:
Originally Posted by Grapeshot
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Yes, sorry - I missed the thread header entirely. I'm trying to match it to my database, but can't match the model I have with the bezel. Perhaps the same model differs for different years of production. The serration doesn't look as sharp as the gen in my image. Could be just the photo though.Quote:
Originally Posted by 116610watches
So check your serial number which is on a 16610T case between the lugs on one side. Does this match with your papers? What is the serial number beginning with? Maybe we are all wrong due to the angle and quality of the picture
The crown guards look wonky.
Attachment 57242
Attachment 57243
This is my Gen 16613 Tritium with original bezel/dial/hands from 1991 sporting the 3135 movement.
Need another pic of the movement with the rotor uncovering the other half.
I think it's the angle of the photo. The case is tipped to the right so we don't see the crown guards completely. @116610watches Maybe another shot with the date centered and/or a shot from the front with emphasis on the crown guards would sort this out.Quote:
Originally Posted by daytonadragon