Originally Posted by
Brightlight
Problem is the guy you're talking about who does nothing will probably prosper and the hard working folks will not. It's an unfair world and effort never brings its fair share of rewards. As a wild example, there was a case in the UK where a rapist in jail won millions on the national lottery. Makes one wonder about God's purpose.... His victim was trying to get reparation now he could afford it but I'm not sure she succeeded, maybe it's ongoing but I know she had one hell of a legal battle on her hands because of the time that had passed. He prospered, his victim suffered even more.
Do we have, or should we feel, a responsibility to our fellow humans? It's a good question but where do you draw the line, unless you become a buddhist where all life is sacred. I guess in the end it's a personal choice. I have to say as I get older the "charity begins at home" tenet holds sway. I would rather give to a homeless person living on the street in London than to someone in Africa, India, or wherever. Don't know why this should be, but it is the way I feel.
Now I was critical of Posh earlier on for "boasting" about her charitable exploits, but what I was forgetting was the difference between the UK and the US. In the UK we are much more reserved about such things to the extent that someone posting what Posh did would be considered to be "blowing their own trumpet" and I genuinely found it uncomfortable. However, the US way is different and more open, particularly about finance, I should have remembered that.