Originally Posted by
AustinTech
I still haven't heard anyone give a reason other than charity or welfare. That is what bailing out the automakers is, it is welfare.
Can't anyone give an actual business related reason to bail them out? Something like, "they have excellent designs ready for future production, they have the best technology for more environmentally safer cars, they have a plan on how to reduce the costs of producing their cars, they are only having cash flow problems, their business model is sound...etc."
I haven't heard it cause it isn't true. And THAT is why they should go under. Hell, they've been dead in the water for years now. Their friggin cars are horrible (other than the engines). Designs? Bad. Style? Bad. Average cost to produce a car? Sky high. Why in the world would that kind of business deserve to get bailed out? The answer, they don't.
It's too bad people would lose their jobs. I feel great compassion for those individuals. But this is business, not charity. Do we keep bad businesses around based on charity? And don't give me that "blow to the economy" "we can't afford that" crap. We can't afford to keep crap companies like this around, that is what we can't afford.
Let them die, then somebody smarter and better will buy their assets and make better cars.