Quote Originally Posted by Posh View Post
That's the point, babe.

Now, if only someone could get ME to change my mind on those damn Panerais, we'll have a REAL convert on our hands. Because I, and watch collector's at large, still don't get it. I'm trying though. I'm really trying.

I do know this though, my dad actually was at a dealer having the clasp fixed on his genuine Yachtmaster and looked at the Panerais while he was waiting and liked them..

He said, " Posh, I like these. You can see the numbers really well because it's so big! (he's 60)" But he didn't really seriously consider one because he thought they were overpriced and, since he's a judge, he'd look silly wearing one.
Posh,

I would drop by a Panerai AD. I actually posted an "I get it now" thread after I did so. I tried on a genuine 112, a Ferrari and a 289. The moment I tried it on, I got it. I love the contrast of the watch. It's a rugged yet elegant simplicity. Do I believe that they are a variation on a theme, yes I do. But I also believe that their story (Italian Royal Navy) dictates the design. Again, as you pointed out with the DeWitt, history explains the present.

I think a lot of forum members have felt that way. Once they try it on, they like it. Whether it's a PAM or a Patek. I do believe this is an underlying point of your post, as well. Let's give something else a try. Right? So, go try on a Panerai and let us know what you think.

Maybe I'll take my own advise and try a Hublot. I just don't get Hublot.

R