He now has some time to think about his comment
He now has some time to think about his comment
2 Member(s) liked this post
I like the leborn james - and that cuban link - heavy
That's a Day-Date II, right?
I'd love to see a Day-Date II with an Oyster bracelet and a smooth bezel, unfortunately that's not going to happen as Day-Date II got replaced by the Day-Date 40. While the 36mm Day-Date was, and still is offered with an Oyster bracelet, Day-Date II isn't... not sure why, i think the bulky case of Day-Date II would look great paired with the "sporty" Oyster bracelet.
As far as the existing lineup of Day-Date II goes... i don't know, i think that Presidential bracelet and fluted bezel belongs on the classic Day-Date at 36mm, but that's just me.
Yes true, but it looks also nice when you have the DD2 completely prezzy.
The DJ2 with oyster is something for me to think about, the jubilee on a DJ2 is a no-go imho....
I am thinking for a RG DD2 Presidential with the glaziers
Haha, Datejust II is not even offered on Jubilee.
Gen not... But check out the Reps that are on the market right now... Plenty!Originally Posted by JMS1988
Fantasy reps, it seems.
I would very much like a Datejust II in stainless steel with a black diamond dial on an Oyster bracelet. I would be fine with either bezel.
I think it would make a cool daily wearer.
One could only wonder why you'll selling this beauty!
Hahaha you are that much in love with the Daytona?
Yup, i do love the Daytona. Not sure if i'd want one with the diamond dial, but it's a gorgeous piece nonetheless.
As you know I allready got a lot FG watches and again this one is just sitting in the box so that's the reason why it has to go. I also got my eye on a rare Patek wich needs room in my watchbox too so...
Let me off-top for a while:
You know, when the like system was implemented i was actually sceptical! HahahaHahahaha thanks for the statistics
So, kids, who's got the most likes?!?!
Hahaha thanks!
Have had time to think about it and still stick to my original post. But to quantify it by saying that is the kind of look sported by many of the gay community in Manchester (several of whom are very close friends). Was not denigrating the OP or his sexuality. BTW This is NOT an apology of any kind!
salfordsteve, thank you for clarification!
I agree that there is no need for an apology from your side.
On the other hand, the reactions of some posters were immature and disrespectful towards gays.
They(!) should take some time to think about their attitude leading to estimate "gay" as a swearword!
By the way, I myself was pretty surprised when horlogeman mentioned his wife for the first time. ;-)
Again, horlogeman, no offence meant.
1 Member(s) liked this post
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks